Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is poised to declare a state of emergency over the coronavirus, giving governors stronger legal authority to urge people to stay home and businesses to close.

In contrast to stringent lockdowns in some countries, mandating fines and arrests for non-compliance, enforcement will rely more on peer pressure and a deep-rooted Japanese tradition of respect for authority.

Below are the key points regarding the declaration:

WHY NOW?

Under a law revised in March, the premier can declare a state of emergency if the disease poses a “grave danger” to lives and if its rapid spread could have a huge impact on the economy. The state of emergency could last up to two years, with a possible one-year extension.

Abe has come under growing pressure to make the declaration after a surge of virus infection cases in Tokyo and elsewhere. Restricting movement and businesses, however, would deal a heavy blow to an economy already struggling to cope with the virus outbreak.

“A balance of merits and demerits must be considered,” Nobuhiko Okabe, director general of the Kawasaki City Institute of Public Health and a member of an expert panel advising Abe, told Reuters.

Some other experts, however, said the move was already too late, since Tokyo was already seeing an explosive increase in cases.

WHO GETS WHAT POWERS?

Governors in hard-hit regions will have added authority to tell people to stay home, close schools and public facilities and ask businesses to close and cancel events.

Governors can request facilities or businesses used by large numbers of people to limit use or close. If they refuse without an acceptable reason, the facilities can be instructed to do so and the instruction will be made public.

Among businesses that will be asked to close in Tokyo are department stores, movie theatres, shopping malls, night clubs, pachinko parlours and game centres, the Asahi newspaper said.

The law also gives local authorities the power to direct the sale of essential supplies, such as medicine and food, and to request or order emergency transportation of specified goods.

Authorities can also expropriate land and buildings for medical facilities.

The government has designated certain industries such as utilities, transportation and public broadcaster NHK as “designated public institutions” that can be required to disseminate information and necessities in an emergency.

WHY ARE POWERS LIMITED?

Japan has shied away from stronger enforcement steps in part because of memories of civil rights abuses during World War Two, and protection of such rights was enshrined in the U.S.-drated post-war constitution.

“The (pre-war) Meiji Constitution had such powers and there were abuses,” said lawyer Koju Nagai. “The current constitution is based on the idea that human rights should be respected.”

Abe’s ruling party has previously called for a revision of the charter that would include a strong emergency powers clause that critics say would violate human rights, but any such amendment would be controversial and time-consuming.

HOW EFFECTIVE?

Some governors have already asked residents to stay home on weekends, avoid crowds and work at home. That had some effect, but not as much as many experts said was needed.

Many residents of hotspot regions are likely to comply with new requests.

“The Japanese state is powerfully embedded in society and has tremendous power to mould through moral suasion that Western states do not have,” said Sophia University professor Koichi Nakano.

Related Articles

BRIEFS: Faltering Chinese Recovery Leaves Hong Kong Short of IPOs, But Hope Remains

by Sarah Wong |

Shaking off the COVID-19 shadow after three isolated years, Hong Kong is now gripped by a fresh challenge as subdued markets sap the appetite for fundraising activities. With weak global demands and domestic headwinds putting a dent in China's much-hyped reopening, Hong Kong's capital markets have been struggling to take off.

Raring To Go

by Sarah Wong |

Reopened borders, scrapped restrictions, and conciliatory policies have come as relief to PRC law firms in Hong Kong, with economic activities in Greater China expected to steadily pick up following a difficult pandemic period. While lawyers are wary of an uncertain regulatory landscape and moderate investor confidence, they are also banking on their unique positioning as a bridge between China and the rest of the world. 

Skin in the Game

by Sarah Wong |

The COVID-19 pandemic may have irreversibly upended workplace dynamics by relegating in-office work to an option for many employees, and law firms are not insulated from the evolving trend. Leaders share with ALB how they respond to this paradigm shift by nurturing an “ownership mentality” among the up-and-coming generation of talent and cultivating workplace allegiance in the post-pandemic era.