This article was first published in ALB Insights, a weekly, ad-free premium newsletter that provides analysis and opinions related to the important news and trends in Asia’s fast-growing legal markets. Featuring a mix of features, Q&As with key figures, and profiles of some of the hottest firms and service providers, Insights will available only to paid subscribers at the end of its free trial period.

To subscribe to Insights, please email taranjit.kaur@thomsonreuters.com.

 

Long regarded as one of the last stodgy holdouts against innovation in general and technology in particular, the legal industry is waking up to the fact that if it does not embrace technology now, it is likely to be left behind.

To achieve this, law firms are increasingly bringing in dedicated technology specialists to oversee their transformation as well as gain a competitive edge. Although internal organisational structures vary from firm to firm, most sizeable firms have someone in charge of setting information technology strategies and overseeing day-to-day operations.

The reasons for this are manifold, explains Patrick O'Reilly, IT client services director for APAC at Clifford Chance. “Collaborating with clients needs to be easy. To achieve this, someone needs to be worried about the future roadmap for technology and how it can be used to achieve the firm's strategy as it evolves.”

Additionally, clients are demanding more from law firms with regard to data security, which has become one of the biggest priorities in the sector.  A firm is at risk if it doesn't have someone focused on this key area and delivering security solutions that meet clients’ requirements.

Clients also expect law firms to drive efficiencies through adoption of new technologies such as artificial intelligence, which cause  lower value tasks to be automated, thus driving down costs.

While specific roles vary, firms are beginning to trust internal advisors to help navigate the range of technologies at their disposal – along with the challenges they bring.

“You need an owner for your technology roadmap,” says O’Reilly. “This could be a CTO, a CIO, global head of architect or a global head of infrastructure.  Everything depends on the size of the firm, its global reach and its level of IT sophistication. A small local firm wouldn't typically have a CTO role, so this might fall to the IT manager.  It really depends on your client base and what they are demanding.”

AN EVOLVING ROLE

The role of a CTO revolves around gathering feedback from the business around pain points to ensure that any future technological changes can be used to address those issues.

In addition, CTOs are expected to communicate the IT roadmap to the business in terms of short-, medium- and long-term strategies to gain buy-in. They also invest in technology, strive to understand the impact of technology change on the business, and align training materials and resources to support these.

As O’Reilly points out, “They are also involved in understanding the impact of technology change on business processes and on the day-to-day support teams and what is needed to increase the skills and knowledge of various teams. They evaluate newer technologies and how they might benefit the firm in the long run.”

Moreover, every law firm is now being challenged by the rapid emergence of different forms of cyber risks, and this only bolsters the need for a technology officer. “Protecting the data of our clients and our firm is a top priority, and we have a strong information risk management system in place for this purpose,” says Andrew Stoutley, administrative director at Thailand-headquartered Tilleke & Gibbins.

That said, CTOs at law firms cannot work in isolation. It wouldn’t be effective to have an IT team implementing technology solutions that don’t meet the needs of lawyers and – even more importantly – the needs of clients. 

“It’s our lawyers who work closely with our clients, listening to their requirements and learning about their businesses. Therefore, it's essential for our IT group to work closely with the firm’s lawyers on tech activities,” adds Stoutley.

Related Articles

[ALB Insights] 'Novel structure': Taylor Vinters on its unique SG combination

by Raj Gunashekar |

In February, UK-based Taylor Vinters merged with SG boutique Via Law through a one-of-a-kind cross-ownership structure. ALB talked to CEO Matt Meyer about why firm chose that route and what the future holds for Taylor Vinters Via.

[ALB Insights] Even as Myanmar’s investment star wanes, law firms remain optimistic

by Raj Gunashekar |

Myanmar has seen its foreign direct investment drop sharply in the past year as investors adopt a wait-and-see approach following the last election. However, law firms remain undeterred about the country’s prospects after democratisation.

[ALB Insights] Five years of KWM: ‘Our values are very similar’

by Ranajit Dam |

Formed out of a first-of-its kind law firm merger, King & Wood Mallesons recently marked its fifth year. Despite the negative press over its European offices, KWM says it has much to celebrate and is quite bullish about its future.